%20RESIZE.jpg)
Our approach
What the agreement covers
A shareholders' agreement ("SHA") works alongside your company's articles of association to govern the relationship between shareholders'. Where the articles are a public document filed at Companies House, the SHA is private and can go further: covering reserved matters (decisions that require shareholder approval), share transfer restrictions, pre-emption rights, drag-along and tag-along provisions, anti-dilution protections, and what happens if a shareholder wants to leave or has to.
Every agreement we produce is built around your company: how it is structured, where it is heading, and what matters to the people in it.

%20RESIZE.jpg)
How we work with you
We agree a fixed fee before any work starts, so you know the cost upfront.
Before we draft anything, we take the time to understand the business, the plans, and the dynamic between the shareholders'. We will usually send you a short questionnaire to get the detail we need, then talk you through the key decisions: what provisions to include, how to handle different scenarios, and what the options are. The goal is a document that reflects what you actually want, not a standard set of terms you have not thought about.
We explain what each clause means in plain terms so you can make informed choices. This is your agreement: we are there to advise, not to decide for you.
Who we work with
We work with founder-led agencies, tech businesses and high-growth companies at every stage: co-founders putting a proper structure in place for the first time, businesses taking on investment, existing shareholders' restructuring their arrangements, and management teams preparing for a buyout or exit.
We can advise individual shareholders', groups of shareholders', or the company itself in connection with a shareholders' agreement.

Pricing
Fixed-fee project
Available via subscription
Case Studies
Hear from our clients
Meet the team
Frequently Asked Questions
The articles of association are a public document, filed at Companies House, that sets out the basic rules for how the company is governed: how shares are issued, how directors are appointed, how meetings are run. Every company has them.
A shareholders agreement is a private contract between the shareholders. It can cover matters the articles cannot, including confidentiality obligations, restrictions on what shareholders can do (such as competing with the company), detailed exit provisions, and decision-making arrangements that go beyond what company law requires. Because it is private, it does not appear on the public register.
Most well-structured businesses have both. The SHA does the heavy lifting on the commercial relationship between shareholders; the articles handle the company law mechanics.
Yes, and arguably this is when it matters most. Two-founder businesses are the most common source of shareholder disputes, because the structure often means neither party can force a decision. Without a SHA, you are relying on goodwill and the default position under company law, which is rarely what either party actually wants.
A well-drafted SHA between co-founders should cover what happens if one of you wants to leave, what happens if you cannot agree on a major decision, how shares are valued if someone exits, and whether a departing founder can compete with the business. These are uncomfortable conversations to have, but far easier to have at the start than in the middle of a dispute.
Almost certainly yes, and the investor will almost certainly ask for one. Investors typically want minority protections: reserved matters they have a veto on, information rights, anti-dilution provisions, and rights to follow their investment in future rounds.
If the investor's solicitors send you a SHA, it will be drafted to protect the investor. We review it from your perspective as founder, advise on what is standard and what is not, and negotiate the points that matter. Some provisions that look routine are more significant than they appear.
If there is no shareholders agreement in place, the answer depends on the percentage holdings and what company law provides. In many cases, a 50/50 deadlock means the company cannot function. Even where one shareholder has a majority, minority shareholders have some protections under law, but they are limited.
A good SHA includes a deadlock mechanism: a structured process for resolving disputes, which might include mediation, a casting vote for the chair, or ultimately a buy-sell provision (sometimes called a shotgun clause) that gives one party the right to buy out the other at a price they set. The right mechanism depends on the structure of the business and the relationship between the parties.
Yes, but usually only with the unanimous consent of all shareholders who are party to it, unless the agreement itself provides a different threshold for amendments. This is one reason why it is worth getting the document right at the start rather than assuming it can be easily updated later.
If the shareholder base changes significantly, for example through a new investment round, the SHA will typically need to be replaced or supplemented with a new agreement that reflects the new structure. We can advise on whether an amendment or a full replacement is the right approach.










